Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: Yesterday at 04:25 by Peterxy12 in topic Modify gadget
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Fast (talk | contribs)
Tags: Reply Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Line 1: Line 1:
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
{{/header}}
{{/header}}
{{shortcut|TW:CP|TW:COM}}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__


==Proposal==
== Oversight role? ==
{{ping|MacFan4000|Void}} Do you think it'd be possible to get an oversight role? [[User:Seemplez|Seemplez]] ([[User talk:Seemplez|talk]]) 14:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Should we create a group of trusted bureaucrats, empowered to assist stewards? This group would not have access to PII. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 19:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
:{{ping|Seemplez}} I'm just gonna bump in here, but there's no need for it right now. From what I've seen, everything is fine, and the CheckUser right isn't really needed either, the only use for the Steward permission is that it can revoke bureaucrat permissions from a user. [[User:BlackWidowMovie0|BlackWidowMovie0]] ([[User talk:BlackWidowMovie0|talk]]) 17:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
::I think we already have both kinds of oversight on this wiki, from google I saw https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/oversight which is revision deletion you should already be able to do the admin kind of revision deletion, there is also the suppress kind, which was done to a few entries a long time ago by MacFan4000, but for that you need to be in the [[Test Wiki:Suppress|suppress user group]] and only the stewards can assign that. [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] ([[User talk:Fast|talk]]) 18:14, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
:If a steward thinks you should have it, and assigns it to you, or you become a steward, then yes. Otherwise, no. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|Fast|Justarandomamerican|BlackWidowMovie0}} Thanks. [[User:Seemplez|Seemplez]] ([[User talk:Seemplez|talk]]) 11:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


===Discussion===
== CheckUser testing ==
====Support====
*{{support|strongest}} [[User:Quaille|Quaille]] ([[User talk:Quaille|talk]]) 07:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
*{{support}}, but I think the functions and requirements of this group need to be explained further. [[User:AsamuraShiki|<span style="color:#39C5BB"><span lang="ja">浅村しき</span></span>]] ([[User_talk:AsamuraShiki|<span style="color:#FFA500">talk</span>]]) 07:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)


====Oppose====
Currently, as shown in [[Special:ListGroupRights]], it seems that only bureaucrats may use the <code>checkuser-limited</code> permission. This permission allows checking oneself for the purpose of testing out the tool. It may be a good idea to grant this permission to administrators as administrators is the primary for-testing group here and it should not be necessary to request bureaucratship for testing. In addition, when it is only possible to check oneself there is very little capacity for damage (checking others will still be limited to Stewards).


====Comments/Neutral====
Opinions? [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 22:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
*I have no opposition in regards to the concept of this group at present time, though I do think it needs to be fleshed out more (permissions, granting criteria, etc.) before a community discussion/vote. I do, however, question the current need of the group as there are frankly a sufficient number of stewards to handle all tasks. If this were to change, I would likely be in support, but as of now, I'm going to land in {{neutral}}. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#0F69B3;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 22:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
:Agree <code>checkuser-limited</code> is not really that sensitive, and certainly has less potential for damage than many of the other rights bundled with administrator. [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] ([[User talk:Fast|talk]]) 03:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
:Agree. You can only test checkuser on yourself. Making a phabricator task..... [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 13:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
*:Here's a more fleshed out idea: This group would have no more special user rights than regular bureaucrats, and therefore, would merely be a list of users empowered to assist. Assist, well, that could be a variety of things, but I'll define it as "issue user restrictions, long term blocks, and any other measures deemed necessary to assist stewards." How does that sound? [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
::[https://phabricator.testwiki.wiki/T43 Phabricator task] [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
*::In terms of granting criteria: there must be some form of activity on the wiki, and the group would be Steward appointed only, with a vote of confidence from another steward required. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
*I'm honestly not sure where to land my vote on this. However, I lean towards giving weak support or opposition mainly because activity hasn't been elevating around here lately. Thus, there isn't much to combat in terms of vandalism. Yes, there is ongoing spam, but Bosco has been actively fighting against it and does an excellent job of doing so. I agree with X's "fleshed out" idea and the mention of the steward's team. [[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 22:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
*What user rights would the proposed user group have? [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|talk]]) 21:49, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
*:None, it would purely be a list of users empowered to assist. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:13, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
*:Technically, they are your average everyday bureaucrats. The only difference is, these bureaucrats are formally entrusted to assist stewards on their job. [[User:Quaille|Quaille]] ([[User talk:Quaille|talk]]) 07:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)


==Peterxy12 for stewardship==
== [[User:CptViraj]] ==
{{discussion top|Withdrawn. --[[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 09:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)<br><small>Fix {{tl|discussion top}} [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 09:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)</small>}}
Hello All, I am Peterxy12, an active administrator and bureaucrat on testwiki.wiki. I have been here for a little over 2 months and I believe I can help perform steward actions when they are requested. I think our community needs multiple active stewards at all times and currently we have 0. If the above request for stewardship is successful, then we would have 1. I believe we need a steward team, which is more than 1. I believe I can assist there because when I requested a rename it took over a month because our current stewards are busy on other projects. I have performed all rights requests since my account was created. I have also performed all inactivity removals. Each of these I have performed appropriately. With steward tools, particularly suppression and checkuser, I understand how they work and can use them well. I will use oversight to hide personal information and extreme threats. With checkuser, I will investigate the IPs of accounts and LTA. Feel free to ask me questions below. [[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 07:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC)


===Support===
Please delete my userpage, Thanks! -- [[User:CptViraj|CptViraj]] ([[User talk:CptViraj|talk]]) 05:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
----
*{{Done}} --[[User:Q8j|Q8j]] ([[User talk:Q8j|talk]]) 08:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


===Oppose===
== Spam abuse filters ==
*{{Oppose2|strongest}} [[User:Quaille|Quaille]] ([[User talk:Quaille|talk]]) 08:23, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
*{{oppose}} We have already 6 stewards and we can find them on Discord to do any steward actions (such as renaming users and perform CU and OS actions). Also, I am not sure this user can use steward tools accordingly. [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 08:32, 25 January 2026 (UTC)


===Netural===
I'd like to propose that we enable automatic blocking on our anti-spam abuse filters, as they have a rare false positive rate (and we can just unblock if there is a false positive). [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 17:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)


===Comments===
{{Support}} I Do think we could use filter for that. --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 18:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
:: Good idea, I had considered proposing this for a while but had never got around to it. Blocking is a restricted action though, so this will need to be closed by a stewards. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 23:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
#Do you hold any CU or OS rights on other wikis? [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 08:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
::: We also need it because there is no way in hell I am doing [https://testwiki.wiki/images/a/a6/Spambots.png this] again. [[User:Naleksuh|Naleksuh]] ([[User talk:Naleksuh|talk]]) 00:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
#:Sorry. I'll {{withdrawn}}. [[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 09:15, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
{{discussion bottom}}
:::: Geez, I normally mop up the mess the spambots make, and never have I had to give myself the bot flag, nor flood the log like that. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:49, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


==Rename==
It looks like we had another Hell load of Bot accounts today and don't worry Nalekshu I can always do mass blocking if you need me to or want me to do it just Message me and I'll do it 🙂 --[[User:Cocopuff2018|Cocopuff2018]] ([[User talk:Cocopuff2018|talk]]) 04:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


Don't find a page for steward's requests, so i ask here my rename to the username "Muffy" if it's possible. Thanks. <span style="background-color:magenta; padding: 2px 5px 1px 5px">[[User:DodoMan|<span style="color:blue">Dodo</span>]].[[User talk:DodoMan|Let's talk!]]</span> 18:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
'''Agree''', and prompt autoblocks will also prevent the spambots from creating new accounts on the same IP for 24 hours reducing the hit rate and making it easier to find any false positives. We can always tweak the filters that result in immediate blocks if problems occur. It may be advisable to limit blocks only to registered accounts for now since they are so far responsible for nearly all edits that trip the filter. [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] ([[User talk:Fast|talk]])

:{{Done}} [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 18:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

==Modify gadget==

Use [[User:SaoMikoto/js/Gadget-RequestSolver.js]] to replace [[MediaWiki:Gadget-RequestSolver.js]]. Add a confirmation pop-up to prevent accidental clicks. —— <span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;font-style:italic">From [[User:SaoMikoto|<span style="color:#0b007f">SAOUTAX</span>]] the Dual Blades [[TW:BC|<span style="color:#0b007f">Bureaucrat</span>]]</span> 04:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

:{{done}} [[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 04:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:25, 7 February 2026

The community portal is Test Wiki's village pump and noticeboards, two-in-one.

Archives: 123456
Shortcuts


Proposal

Should we create a group of trusted bureaucrats, empowered to assist stewards? This group would not have access to PII. Justarandomamerican (talk) 19:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Comments/Neutral

  • I have no opposition in regards to the concept of this group at present time, though I do think it needs to be fleshed out more (permissions, granting criteria, etc.) before a community discussion/vote. I do, however, question the current need of the group as there are frankly a sufficient number of stewards to handle all tasks. If this were to change, I would likely be in support, but as of now, I'm going to land in Neutral Neutral. X (talk + contribs) 22:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Here's a more fleshed out idea: This group would have no more special user rights than regular bureaucrats, and therefore, would merely be a list of users empowered to assist. Assist, well, that could be a variety of things, but I'll define it as "issue user restrictions, long term blocks, and any other measures deemed necessary to assist stewards." How does that sound? Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    In terms of granting criteria: there must be some form of activity on the wiki, and the group would be Steward appointed only, with a vote of confidence from another steward required. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm honestly not sure where to land my vote on this. However, I lean towards giving weak support or opposition mainly because activity hasn't been elevating around here lately. Thus, there isn't much to combat in terms of vandalism. Yes, there is ongoing spam, but Bosco has been actively fighting against it and does an excellent job of doing so. I agree with X's "fleshed out" idea and the mention of the steward's team. Username (talk) 22:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • What user rights would the proposed user group have? Codename Noreste (talk) 21:49, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    None, it would purely be a list of users empowered to assist. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:13, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Technically, they are your average everyday bureaucrats. The only difference is, these bureaucrats are formally entrusted to assist stewards on their job. Quaille (talk) 07:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Peterxy12 for stewardship

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Withdrawn. --Peterxy12 (talk) 09:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Fix {{discussion top}} Bosco (talk) 09:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello All, I am Peterxy12, an active administrator and bureaucrat on testwiki.wiki. I have been here for a little over 2 months and I believe I can help perform steward actions when they are requested. I think our community needs multiple active stewards at all times and currently we have 0. If the above request for stewardship is successful, then we would have 1. I believe we need a steward team, which is more than 1. I believe I can assist there because when I requested a rename it took over a month because our current stewards are busy on other projects. I have performed all rights requests since my account was created. I have also performed all inactivity removals. Each of these I have performed appropriately. With steward tools, particularly suppression and checkuser, I understand how they work and can use them well. I will use oversight to hide personal information and extreme threats. With checkuser, I will investigate the IPs of accounts and LTA. Feel free to ask me questions below. Peterxy12 (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support

Oppose

Netural

Comments

  1. Do you hold any CU or OS rights on other wikis? Bosco (talk) 08:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Sorry. I'll Request withdrawn. Peterxy12 (talk) 09:15, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Rename

Don't find a page for steward's requests, so i ask here my rename to the username "Muffy" if it's possible. Thanks. Dodo.Let's talk! 18:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done The AP (talk) 18:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Modify gadget

Use User:SaoMikoto/js/Gadget-RequestSolver.js to replace MediaWiki:Gadget-RequestSolver.js. Add a confirmation pop-up to prevent accidental clicks. —— From SAOUTAX the Dual Blades Bureaucrat 04:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done Peterxy12 (talk) 04:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply