Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
Piccadilly (talk | contribs) |
→Modify gadget: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NEWSECTIONLINK__ |
__NEWSECTIONLINK__ |
||
{{/header}} |
{{/header}} |
||
{{shortcut|TW:CP|TW:COM}} |
|||
__NEWSECTIONLINK__ |
|||
==Proposal== |
|||
== Mind if I suggest something? == |
|||
Should we create a group of trusted bureaucrats, empowered to assist stewards? This group would not have access to PII. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 19:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
===Discussion=== |
|||
Instead of having your access to the admin tools after 1 month goes by without activity, why not just have it be 3 months instead? I'd say that 1 month is a bit too short, and I'm not sure how one month would be enough of a reason. --[[User:DarkMatterMan4500|DarkMatterMan4500]] ([[User talk:DarkMatterMan4500|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/DarkMatterMan4500|contribs]]) 13:51, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
====Support==== |
|||
*{{support|strongest}} [[User:Quaille|Quaille]] ([[User talk:Quaille|talk]]) 07:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
*{{support}}, but I think the functions and requirements of this group need to be explained further. [[User:AsamuraShiki|<span style="color:#39C5BB"><span lang="ja">浅村しき</span></span>]] ([[User_talk:AsamuraShiki|<span style="color:#FFA500">talk</span>]]) 07:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
====Oppose==== |
||
: {{Support}} I like this idea, and can't see any drawbacks to it. [[User:Seiyena|Sei]] ([[Special:Contribs/Seiyena|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Seiyena|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 16:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Support}} I think it should be extended. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 16:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Support}} Per nom. [[User:I_am_One|I am one]] ([[User_talk:I_am_One|as you are three]]) 23:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Support}} I absolutely agree with that! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 14:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
=== |
====Comments/Neutral==== |
||
*I have no opposition in regards to the concept of this group at present time, though I do think it needs to be fleshed out more (permissions, granting criteria, etc.) before a community discussion/vote. I do, however, question the current need of the group as there are frankly a sufficient number of stewards to handle all tasks. If this were to change, I would likely be in support, but as of now, I'm going to land in {{neutral}}. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#0F69B3;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 22:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
:{{oppose}} We're giving out adminship and 'cratship as if they were candies. Isn't that good enough? [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh]] ([[User talk:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|talk]]) 10:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*:Here's a more fleshed out idea: This group would have no more special user rights than regular bureaucrats, and therefore, would merely be a list of users empowered to assist. Assist, well, that could be a variety of things, but I'll define it as "issue user restrictions, long term blocks, and any other measures deemed necessary to assist stewards." How does that sound? [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
::It's definitely good but it would save bureaucrats some work by not having to re-add user rights so often and also save everyone else the hassle of having to ask for the rights again after just a short one-month hiatus. [[User:Seiyena|Sei]] ([[Special:Contribs/Seiyena|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Seiyena|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 12:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*::In terms of granting criteria: there must be some form of activity on the wiki, and the group would be Steward appointed only, with a vote of confidence from another steward required. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{u|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh}} Being honest, revocation of an advanced permission after 1 month just seems too short, and I'd recommend at least 3 months, as it's usually fair, in terms of how we all operate on the Public Test Wiki on Miraheze. --[[User:DarkMatterMan4500|DarkMatterMan4500]] ([[User talk:DarkMatterMan4500|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/DarkMatterMan4500|contribs]]) 13:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*I'm honestly not sure where to land my vote on this. However, I lean towards giving weak support or opposition mainly because activity hasn't been elevating around here lately. Thus, there isn't much to combat in terms of vandalism. Yes, there is ongoing spam, but Bosco has been actively fighting against it and does an excellent job of doing so. I agree with X's "fleshed out" idea and the mention of the steward's team. [[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 22:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
*What user rights would the proposed user group have? [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|talk]]) 21:49, 25 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
*:None, it would purely be a list of users empowered to assist. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:13, 25 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
*:Technically, they are your average everyday bureaucrats. The only difference is, these bureaucrats are formally entrusted to assist stewards on their job. [[User:Quaille|Quaille]] ([[User talk:Quaille|talk]]) 07:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
==Peterxy12 for stewardship== |
|||
== Should the policy be updated now? == |
|||
{{discussion top|Withdrawn. --[[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 09:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)<br><small>Fix {{tl|discussion top}} [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 09:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)</small>}} |
|||
Seeing as this has majority support, should one of the bureaucrats update the policy to reflect the new time? Or do we have to get a Steward's approval for policy changes? [[User:Seiyena|Sei]] ([[Special:Contribs/Seiyena|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Seiyena|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 14:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Hello All, I am Peterxy12, an active administrator and bureaucrat on testwiki.wiki. I have been here for a little over 2 months and I believe I can help perform steward actions when they are requested. I think our community needs multiple active stewards at all times and currently we have 0. If the above request for stewardship is successful, then we would have 1. I believe we need a steward team, which is more than 1. I believe I can assist there because when I requested a rename it took over a month because our current stewards are busy on other projects. I have performed all rights requests since my account was created. I have also performed all inactivity removals. Each of these I have performed appropriately. With steward tools, particularly suppression and checkuser, I understand how they work and can use them well. I will use oversight to hide personal information and extreme threats. With checkuser, I will investigate the IPs of accounts and LTA. Feel free to ask me questions below. [[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 07:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
===Support=== |
|||
== CheckUser request == |
|||
===Oppose=== |
|||
*[[User:七海娜娜米2b]] |
|||
*{{Oppose2|strongest}} [[User:Quaille|Quaille]] ([[User talk:Quaille|talk]]) 08:23, 25 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
*[[User:七海娜娜米3b]] |
|||
*{{oppose}} We have already 6 stewards and we can find them on Discord to do any steward actions (such as renaming users and perform CU and OS actions). Also, I am not sure this user can use steward tools accordingly. [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 08:32, 25 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
*[[User:想舞花]] |
|||
These 2 users are blocked intefinite on Chinese Wikipedia and locked on Wikimedia foundation and [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=30118 this action] is suspected. Thanks! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 16:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Ping|想舞花}} Could you explain the reason for [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=30118 this action] please? [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 20:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::{{ping|AlPaD}} I mean: give him permissions other than admin.--[[User:想舞花|想舞花]] ([[User talk:想舞花|talk]]) 23:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{Ping|想舞花}} Thanks for reply! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 07:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Maybe it's their test account. Also, I don't know why being indefinitely blocked on Wikipedia or globally locked on Wikimedia matters here. My Wikimedia account is globally locked and blocked indefinitely on English Wikipedia, but as long as people behave here, I think they should be welcome here. [[User:Seiyena|Sei]] ([[Special:Contribs/Seiyena|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Seiyena|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 20:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::{{Ping|Seiyena}} I don't think is a test account because he had requested administrator rights, while the test accounts don't need to be requested. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a sockpuppet issue. It's better steward see the issue and let our know if he needs CheckUser. [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 07:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Netural=== |
|||
== [[Special:AbuseFilter/52]] == |
|||
===Comments=== |
|||
The third line should have been <code>& !page_id == 702</code>. Currently it's checking for spam edits on [[TW:RFP]]... [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh]] ([[User talk:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|talk]]) 10:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
#Do you hold any CU or OS rights on other wikis? [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 08:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
#:Sorry. I'll {{withdrawn}}. [[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 09:15, 25 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
::Can't admins edit the filters themselves? I know that on another wiki that was possible. Just saying. [[User:Seiyena|Sei]] ([[Special:Contribs/Seiyena|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Seiyena|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 19:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
|||
:::Filters with restricted actions (namely, blocking) can only be edited by Stewards. — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Arcversin|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Arcversin|talk]])</span> 01:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:It would actually be <code>page_id != 702</code>, since this is an equality check. Also, it's generally good practice to surround any negation that isn't a single function with parentheses, like so: <code>!('x' in y)</code> — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Arcversin|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Arcversin|talk]])</span> 01:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==Rename== |
|||
== In regards to [[User:Seiyena]]. == |
|||
Don't find a page for steward's requests, so i ask here my rename to the username "Muffy" if it's possible. Thanks. <span style="background-color:magenta; padding: 2px 5px 1px 5px">[[User:DodoMan|<span style="color:blue">Dodo</span>]].[[User talk:DodoMan|Let's talk!]]</span> 18:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
|||
::This has already been addressed, by another user. I strongly loathe any sort of 'community block' for [[w:WP:AGF|good-faith]], even marginally good-faith users. Block, CheckUser, rinse, and repeat has been tried, and I'm not keen to go back there, at least not ''yet''. This is a [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Steward]]-managed affair, and I did suggest it might've been ''too soon'' to grant bureaucrat. In any case, I'm going to work on having [[User:Arcversin|Arcversin]] deploy the Miraheze global abuse filter to mitigate this. I don't believe an indefinite suspension of bureaucrat; I would rather manage this a month at a time. If bureaucrat revocation is required, I'll do that. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 23:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:{{Done}} [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 18:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Hi all, I hope this message finds you well. |
|||
After [[Special:Diff/21471|noticing]] more and more reports regarding Seiyena, I have come to the decision to cast a vote regarding this user. |
|||
==Modify gadget== |
|||
This user has made '''several''' racist, homophobic and frankly, disgusting comments on this Wiki. They have had chance after chance to stop this behavior and have even been given Administrator permissions after every "apology". |
|||
Frankly, I think they are unfit to be a sysop on this Wiki and I am here to ask for the community's opinion on a blacklist for requesting permissions. |
|||
Pinging {{Ping|Dmehus}} & {{Ping|MacFan4000}} for their opinion. [[User:Trayfel|Trayfel]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Trayfel|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Trayfel|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 19:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: |
Use [[User:SaoMikoto/js/Gadget-RequestSolver.js]] to replace [[MediaWiki:Gadget-RequestSolver.js]]. Add a confirmation pop-up to prevent accidental clicks. —— <span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;font-style:italic">From [[User:SaoMikoto|<span style="color:#0b007f">SAOUTAX</span>]] the Dual Blades [[TW:BC|<span style="color:#0b007f">Bureaucrat</span>]]</span> 04:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC) |
||
::Considering the amount of abuse you have contributed towards this Wiki, I would say if granted, the RFP blacklist would be indefinite. [[User:Trayfel|Trayfel]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Trayfel|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Trayfel|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 19:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{Ping|Trayfel}} Hello! Maybe for a while she should be blocked from some namespaces and have lower rights (autopatrol, researcher etc). [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 19:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::I like AlPad's idea, and wouldn't be against a temporary blacklist, to be honest. I don't like the indefinite idea, but do feel that maybe temporary is warranted. [[User:Seiyena|Sei]] ([[Special:Contribs/Seiyena|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Seiyena|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 19:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::With all due regards Sieyena, this isn't down to you. {{Ping|AlPaD}} I agree, I think an indefinite blacklist from sysop permissions with the exception of Seiyena being allowed Autopatrol and researcher. Thoughts? [[User:Trayfel|Trayfel]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Trayfel|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Trayfel|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 19:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
I know that I can't make this decision by myself, but I do think I should at least be able to offer my views on this matter. My proposal is a temporary blacklist from requesting permissions together with a partial block from the Talk namespace and maybe the Request Permissions page. [[User:Seiyena|Sei]] ([[Special:Contribs/Seiyena|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Seiyena|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 21:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' </div> |
|||
: |
:{{done}} [[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 04:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC) |
||
== Lift protection on [[MediaWiki:Common.css]] == |
|||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is closed. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' |
|||
::{{Done|[[Special:Redirect/logid/31337|Done, at least temporarily]]}}, [[User:Arcversin|Arcversin]] et al., chiefly since [[Test Wiki:Interface administrators|interface administrator]] granting and revocation has since been restricted to Stewards for mainly security purposes, but ''do'' note we reserve the right to reinstate [[Test Wiki:Stewards|Steward]] protection for this high impact CSS interface page depending on if [[w:WP:BEANS|BEANSey]] things happen. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 02:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
Could the steward-only create protection on [[MediaWiki:Common.css]] be removed? I'm trying to deploy some styles to get the {{tl|mbox}} series of templates properly working. — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Arcversin|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Arcversin|talk]])</span> 01:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Support}}. I also thought the other day I was going to work with styles, but it was blocked. — Regards, [[U:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''Kazrok4545'''''</span>]] [[UT:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''<small>Talk</small>'''''</span>]] 13:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
: {{Support}} I think the limitations on the MediaWiki:common page are; must be granted bureaucrat permits [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 09:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it</b>. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.'' </div> |
|||
== [[Special:AbuseFilter/89|Filter 89]] == |
|||
Looks like we're getting a few false positives here; I fixed a typo on an AbuseFilter warning and apparently I was disallowed. See [https://testwiki.wiki/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?wptarget=3PPYB6 my abuse log] for reference. |
|||
@[[User:Kazrok4545|Kazrok4545]]—Courtesy ping if you have ideas. Thanks. —[[User:3PPYB6|3PPYB6]] ([[User talk:3PPYB6|talk]]) 16:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:This is the result of the filter filtering for the <code><nowiki><br></nowiki></code> tag, which is a very common indicator of spam. This is actually unnecessary (already in another filter), so I've removed it and extended the exempted groups. {{ping|Kazrok4545}} I've temporarily disabled the filter pending clarification on its intent, were you intending to do something akin to [[Special:AbuseFilter/88|filter 88]], or was this intended to be an addition to [[Special:AbuseFilter/52|filter 52]]? — <span style="font-variant: small-caps">[[User:Arcversin|Arcversin]] ([[User talk:Arcversin|talk]])</span> 20:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::Sorry, I forgot to switch off this filter. It was created for testing. It is advisable to add these words to filter 52. — Regards, [[U:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''Kazrok4545'''''</span>]] [[UT:Kazrok4545|<span style="font-family:comic sans ms ;color:Blue;">'''''<small>Talk</small>'''''</span>]] 12:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Rename Account == |
|||
Hi, |
|||
Could you please rename my account Videojeux4 to HeartsDo, please. |
|||
(Proof: [https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User:HeartsDo here]) [[User:Videojeux4|Videojeux4]] ([[User talk:Videojeux4|talk]]) 04:41, 20 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Pinging {{Ping|Dmehus}} {{Ping|MacFan4000}} [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 05:51, 20 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:[[User:Videojeux4|HeartsDo]], though I don't likely doubt this to be you, would you mind confirming your Test Wiki account from your Miraheze account? Thanks. [[User:Dmehus|Dmehus]] ([[User talk:Dmehus|talk]]) 02:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Block Request == |
|||
Hello, I think it would be good if I took a break from here for a bit. Could someone please block me for a few days, like maybe until May 1? Thank you very much. [[User:Seiyena|Sei]] ([[Special:Contribs/Seiyena|<span style="color:red">My changes here</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Seiyena|<span style="color:#0080ff">Drop me a line</span>]]) 09:34, 25 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:25, 7 February 2026
| The community portal is Test Wiki's village pump and noticeboards, two-in-one. | |||
| Archives: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | |||
Proposal
Should we create a group of trusted bureaucrats, empowered to assist stewards? This group would not have access to PII. Justarandomamerican (talk) 19:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
Discussion
Support
Strongest support Quaille (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
Support, but I think the functions and requirements of this group need to be explained further. 浅村しき (talk) 07:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments/Neutral
- I have no opposition in regards to the concept of this group at present time, though I do think it needs to be fleshed out more (permissions, granting criteria, etc.) before a community discussion/vote. I do, however, question the current need of the group as there are frankly a sufficient number of stewards to handle all tasks. If this were to change, I would likely be in support, but as of now, I'm going to land in
Neutral. X (talk + contribs) 22:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- Here's a more fleshed out idea: This group would have no more special user rights than regular bureaucrats, and therefore, would merely be a list of users empowered to assist. Assist, well, that could be a variety of things, but I'll define it as "issue user restrictions, long term blocks, and any other measures deemed necessary to assist stewards." How does that sound? Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- In terms of granting criteria: there must be some form of activity on the wiki, and the group would be Steward appointed only, with a vote of confidence from another steward required. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- Here's a more fleshed out idea: This group would have no more special user rights than regular bureaucrats, and therefore, would merely be a list of users empowered to assist. Assist, well, that could be a variety of things, but I'll define it as "issue user restrictions, long term blocks, and any other measures deemed necessary to assist stewards." How does that sound? Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm honestly not sure where to land my vote on this. However, I lean towards giving weak support or opposition mainly because activity hasn't been elevating around here lately. Thus, there isn't much to combat in terms of vandalism. Yes, there is ongoing spam, but Bosco has been actively fighting against it and does an excellent job of doing so. I agree with X's "fleshed out" idea and the mention of the steward's team. Username (talk) 22:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
- What user rights would the proposed user group have? Codename Noreste (talk) 21:49, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
- None, it would purely be a list of users empowered to assist. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:13, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
- Technically, they are your average everyday bureaucrats. The only difference is, these bureaucrats are formally entrusted to assist stewards on their job. Quaille (talk) 07:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Peterxy12 for stewardship
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Withdrawn. --Peterxy12 (talk) 09:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Fix {{discussion top}} Bosco (talk) 09:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
- Withdrawn. --Peterxy12 (talk) 09:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Hello All, I am Peterxy12, an active administrator and bureaucrat on testwiki.wiki. I have been here for a little over 2 months and I believe I can help perform steward actions when they are requested. I think our community needs multiple active stewards at all times and currently we have 0. If the above request for stewardship is successful, then we would have 1. I believe we need a steward team, which is more than 1. I believe I can assist there because when I requested a rename it took over a month because our current stewards are busy on other projects. I have performed all rights requests since my account was created. I have also performed all inactivity removals. Each of these I have performed appropriately. With steward tools, particularly suppression and checkuser, I understand how they work and can use them well. I will use oversight to hide personal information and extreme threats. With checkuser, I will investigate the IPs of accounts and LTA. Feel free to ask me questions below. Peterxy12 (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Support
Oppose
Strongest oppose Quaille (talk) 08:23, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose We have already 6 stewards and we can find them on Discord to do any steward actions (such as renaming users and perform CU and OS actions). Also, I am not sure this user can use steward tools accordingly. Bosco (talk) 08:32, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Netural
Comments
- Do you hold any CU or OS rights on other wikis? Bosco (talk) 08:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry. I'll
Request withdrawn. Peterxy12 (talk) 09:15, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry. I'll
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Rename
Don't find a page for steward's requests, so i ask here my rename to the username "Muffy" if it's possible. Thanks. Dodo.Let's talk! 18:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
Modify gadget
Use User:SaoMikoto/js/Gadget-RequestSolver.js to replace MediaWiki:Gadget-RequestSolver.js. Add a confirmation pop-up to prevent accidental clicks. —— From SAOUTAX the Dual Blades Bureaucrat 04:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)