Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: 04:25 by Peterxy12 in topic Modify gadget
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reply Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Line 1: Line 1:
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
{{/header}}
{{/header}}
{{shortcut|TW:CP|TW:COM}}
__NEWSECTIONLINK__
{{shortcut|TW:COM}}


==Proposal==
==Merry Christmas!==
Should we create a group of trusted bureaucrats, empowered to assist stewards? This group would not have access to PII. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 19:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
Merry Christmas to all those here at The Test Wiki.


===Discussion===
Have a wonderful day and all the best for 2024!
====Support====
*{{support|strongest}} [[User:Quaille|Quaille]] ([[User talk:Quaille|talk]]) 07:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
*{{support}}, but I think the functions and requirements of this group need to be explained further. [[User:AsamuraShiki|<span style="color:#39C5BB"><span lang="ja">浅村しき</span></span>]] ([[User_talk:AsamuraShiki|<span style="color:#FFA500">talk</span>]]) 07:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)


====Oppose====
Lots of love, [[User:Sav|Sav]] • ([[Special:Contribs/Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff"> Edits</span>]] | [[Special:Newsection/User talk:Sav|<span style="color:#0080ff">Talk </span>]]) 17:51, 24 December 2023 (UTC).


====Comments/Neutral====
==userRightsManager gadget is broken==
*I have no opposition in regards to the concept of this group at present time, though I do think it needs to be fleshed out more (permissions, granting criteria, etc.) before a community discussion/vote. I do, however, question the current need of the group as there are frankly a sufficient number of stewards to handle all tasks. If this were to change, I would likely be in support, but as of now, I'm going to land in {{neutral}}. [[User:X|'''<span style="background:#0F69B3;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">X</span>''']] ([[User talk:X|talk]] + [[Special:Contributions/X|contribs]]) 22:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
I tried to approve a user's permission request with the userRightsManager gadget and found that the gadget is not working properly. Can the interface administrators fix this issue? [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 19:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
*:Here's a more fleshed out idea: This group would have no more special user rights than regular bureaucrats, and therefore, would merely be a list of users empowered to assist. Assist, well, that could be a variety of things, but I'll define it as "issue user restrictions, long term blocks, and any other measures deemed necessary to assist stewards." How does that sound? [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
*::In terms of granting criteria: there must be some form of activity on the wiki, and the group would be Steward appointed only, with a vote of confidence from another steward required. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
*I'm honestly not sure where to land my vote on this. However, I lean towards giving weak support or opposition mainly because activity hasn't been elevating around here lately. Thus, there isn't much to combat in terms of vandalism. Yes, there is ongoing spam, but Bosco has been actively fighting against it and does an excellent job of doing so. I agree with X's "fleshed out" idea and the mention of the steward's team. [[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 22:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
*What user rights would the proposed user group have? [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|talk]]) 21:49, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
*:None, it would purely be a list of users empowered to assist. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:13, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
*:Technically, they are your average everyday bureaucrats. The only difference is, these bureaucrats are formally entrusted to assist stewards on their job. [[User:Quaille|Quaille]] ([[User talk:Quaille|talk]]) 07:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)


==Peterxy12 for stewardship==
:I've reviewed the code and tested the script. It appears to be working for me. Could you please provide more details on what isn't working for you? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
:{{Done|Fixed}}, the move to Request ''for'' permissions broke the script initially. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 14:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
{{discussion top|Withdrawn. --[[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 09:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)<br><small>Fix {{tl|discussion top}} [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 09:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)</small>}}
Hello All, I am Peterxy12, an active administrator and bureaucrat on testwiki.wiki. I have been here for a little over 2 months and I believe I can help perform steward actions when they are requested. I think our community needs multiple active stewards at all times and currently we have 0. If the above request for stewardship is successful, then we would have 1. I believe we need a steward team, which is more than 1. I believe I can assist there because when I requested a rename it took over a month because our current stewards are busy on other projects. I have performed all rights requests since my account was created. I have also performed all inactivity removals. Each of these I have performed appropriately. With steward tools, particularly suppression and checkuser, I understand how they work and can use them well. I will use oversight to hide personal information and extreme threats. With checkuser, I will investigate the IPs of accounts and LTA. Feel free to ask me questions below. [[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 07:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
::Makes sense, thanks for the fix. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 14:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)


===Support===
==Request for Supressor right==
I request oversight rights from our community for 2 days. I will only use it for testing and I promise not to compromise anyone's privacy. [[User:LisafBia|LisafBia]] ([[User talk:LisafBia|talk]]) 21:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)


===Oppose===
:{{not done}} as suppressor is not a test right and will not be given to those who are not stewards or community elected non-steward suppressors, for obvious privacy concerns. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 19:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
*{{Oppose2|strongest}} [[User:Quaille|Quaille]] ([[User talk:Quaille|talk]]) 08:23, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
::One question: as the suppressor right isn't a test right, is the non-steward suppressor right also a non-test right? – [[User:64andtim|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#0024FF;">'''''64andtim'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:64andtim|<span style="color:#0F2298">talk</span>]])</sup> 20:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
*{{oppose}} We have already 6 stewards and we can find them on Discord to do any steward actions (such as renaming users and perform CU and OS actions). Also, I am not sure this user can use steward tools accordingly. [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 08:32, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
:::Indeed. And therefore it is not meant to be tested. It is meant only for serious suppression.
:::The user right is not intended as a test flag like most roles here. It is intended only for serious suppression. System administrator, steward, checkuser, suppressor and non-steward suppressor are emphatically not test roles. [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 20:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
::::Interface admin is also somewhere in the middle. It isn't a testing right, but some people do use it for that. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 20:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


==My IA right==
===Netural===
Could a steward remove my IA permission, please? Thanks a lot, and goodbye! [[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]]) 06:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)


===Comments===
:Dear, @[[User:Username|Username]] {{done}}. Thank you for your edits, we look forward to seeing you again. Kind regards, [[User:Drummingman|Drummingman]] ([[User talk:Drummingman|talk]]) 10:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
#Do you hold any CU or OS rights on other wikis? [[User:Bosco|Bosco]] ([[User talk:Bosco|talk]]) 08:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

#:Sorry. I'll {{withdrawn}}. [[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 09:15, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
==Proposal to change an abuse filter warning==

Hello, everybody.

I propose moving [[MediaWiki:Newuser-externallinks]] to [[MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-newuser-externallinks]], and changing the text of the filter warning message to something like this:

'''Warning:''' An automated filter has identified this edit containing external links. Test Wiki may not be used as a vehicle for promotion, and may result in being blocked from editing. If this edit is constructive, you may click "Publish changes" again to confirm it. If you received this message in error, please inform an [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|administrator]] of what you were trying to do.

Any inputs or concerns about this? If there are no objections, I'll be happy to do those changes in a few days. Thanks. – [[User:64andtim|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#0024FF;">'''''64andtim'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:64andtim|<span style="color:#0F2298">talk</span>]])</sup> 18:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

:As the original creator of the customized warning, I {{support|support}} this change. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 01:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 13:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

==RFC: Clarify [[TW:IP|the inactivity policy]] for Non-steward suppressors==
{{discussion top|{{done|Passes}}. Non-steward suppressors will be held to a 3 month inactivity requirement. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 18:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)}}
This is a rather simple proposal. Shall the inactivity policy:
#Be amended to include a 3 month inactivity period for Non-steward suppressors,
#Be amended to include a 1 year inactivity period for Non-steward suppressors; or
#Be amended to include another inactivity period for non-steward suppressors?
[[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 17:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

:{{support}} 1 as proposer. 3 months seems plenty enough, rather than the 1 year inactivity period granted to Stewards and Sysadmins. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 17:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
:{{s}} option #1 per Justa. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 17:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
:{{s}} the #1 option. – [[User:64andtim|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#0024FF;">'''''64andtim'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:64andtim|<span style="color:#0F2298">talk</span>]])</sup> 18:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
{{discussion bottom}}
{{discussion bottom}}


==Rename==
==Another proposal to import Edit filter warning template==

I was thinking if I could import the Edit filter warning template from the English Wikipedia, but leave out the report error since there is no edit filter false positive page on Test Wiki. Any inputs, concerns or objections?


When triggering an abuse filter, it shows a red box with text; maybe we could add that proposed template under the name "Abuse filter warning", and protect it under an appropriate protection as a high-risk template? Thank you. [[User:64andtim|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#0024FF;">'''''64andtim'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:64andtim|<span style="color:#0F2298">talk</span>]])</sup> 18:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Don't find a page for steward's requests, so i ask here my rename to the username "Muffy" if it's possible. Thanks. <span style="background-color:magenta; padding: 2px 5px 1px 5px">[[User:DodoMan|<span style="color:blue">Dodo</span>]].[[User talk:DodoMan|Let's talk!]]</span> 18:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)


:{{Done}} [[User:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#8B0000; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">The AP </span>]] ([[User talk:TheAstorPastor|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#AA336A">''talk''</span>]]) 18:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
:We can also redirect people to here (the community portal) to report false positives, or to contact an administrator directly. I think having some form of template would make things easier, so no objections. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 18:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
::One more question: is bureaucrat protection appropriate when protecting a high-risk template? – [[User:64andtim|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#0024FF;">'''''64andtim'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:64andtim|<span style="color:#0F2298">talk</span>]])</sup> 18:10, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
:::In this case, it would be, since the template would be used in the interface, and not protecting it as such would allow users without the edit interface right to edit the interface. You can use discretion when protecting pages. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 18:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
::::Fine by me! [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 18:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::Since there are no objections, I'll implement them, but do we keep the report error button that can redirect here to the community portal or not? – [[User:64andtim|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#0024FF;">'''''64andtim'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:64andtim|<span style="color:#0F2298">talk</span>]])</sup> 15:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::Yes, you can redirect it to the community portal. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 15:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}}, but it took a little bit of trial and error for the url to actually work. – [[User:64andtim|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#0024FF;">'''''64andtim'''''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:64andtim|<span style="color:#0F2298">talk</span>]])</sup> 16:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)


==Mobile edit==
==Modify gadget==


Use [[User:SaoMikoto/js/Gadget-RequestSolver.js]] to replace [[MediaWiki:Gadget-RequestSolver.js]]. Add a confirmation pop-up to prevent accidental clicks. —— <span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;font-style:italic">From [[User:SaoMikoto|<span style="color:#0b007f">SAOUTAX</span>]] the Dual Blades [[TW:BC|<span style="color:#0b007f">Bureaucrat</span>]]</span> 04:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Does anyone have an idea why [[Special:Diff/35138|this]] and [[Special:Diff/35122|this]] was marked as mobile web edits, considering that I am on a computer? [[User:EPIC|EPIC]] ([[User talk:EPIC|talk]]) 19:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)


:That is weird, never heard of that happening before. Were you using mobile view when making the edits? [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 19:21, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}} [[User:Peterxy12|Peterxy12]] ([[User talk:Peterxy12|talk]]) 04:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:25, 7 February 2026

The community portal is Test Wiki's village pump and noticeboards, two-in-one.

Archives: 123456
Shortcuts


Proposal

Should we create a group of trusted bureaucrats, empowered to assist stewards? This group would not have access to PII. Justarandomamerican (talk) 19:11, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Comments/Neutral

  • I have no opposition in regards to the concept of this group at present time, though I do think it needs to be fleshed out more (permissions, granting criteria, etc.) before a community discussion/vote. I do, however, question the current need of the group as there are frankly a sufficient number of stewards to handle all tasks. If this were to change, I would likely be in support, but as of now, I'm going to land in Neutral Neutral. X (talk + contribs) 22:14, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Here's a more fleshed out idea: This group would have no more special user rights than regular bureaucrats, and therefore, would merely be a list of users empowered to assist. Assist, well, that could be a variety of things, but I'll define it as "issue user restrictions, long term blocks, and any other measures deemed necessary to assist stewards." How does that sound? Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    In terms of granting criteria: there must be some form of activity on the wiki, and the group would be Steward appointed only, with a vote of confidence from another steward required. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • I'm honestly not sure where to land my vote on this. However, I lean towards giving weak support or opposition mainly because activity hasn't been elevating around here lately. Thus, there isn't much to combat in terms of vandalism. Yes, there is ongoing spam, but Bosco has been actively fighting against it and does an excellent job of doing so. I agree with X's "fleshed out" idea and the mention of the steward's team. Username (talk) 22:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • What user rights would the proposed user group have? Codename Noreste (talk) 21:49, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    None, it would purely be a list of users empowered to assist. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:13, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Technically, they are your average everyday bureaucrats. The only difference is, these bureaucrats are formally entrusted to assist stewards on their job. Quaille (talk) 07:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Peterxy12 for stewardship

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Withdrawn. --Peterxy12 (talk) 09:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Fix {{discussion top}} Bosco (talk) 09:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello All, I am Peterxy12, an active administrator and bureaucrat on testwiki.wiki. I have been here for a little over 2 months and I believe I can help perform steward actions when they are requested. I think our community needs multiple active stewards at all times and currently we have 0. If the above request for stewardship is successful, then we would have 1. I believe we need a steward team, which is more than 1. I believe I can assist there because when I requested a rename it took over a month because our current stewards are busy on other projects. I have performed all rights requests since my account was created. I have also performed all inactivity removals. Each of these I have performed appropriately. With steward tools, particularly suppression and checkuser, I understand how they work and can use them well. I will use oversight to hide personal information and extreme threats. With checkuser, I will investigate the IPs of accounts and LTA. Feel free to ask me questions below. Peterxy12 (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Support

Oppose

Netural

Comments

  1. Do you hold any CU or OS rights on other wikis? Bosco (talk) 08:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Sorry. I'll Request withdrawn. Peterxy12 (talk) 09:15, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Rename

Don't find a page for steward's requests, so i ask here my rename to the username "Muffy" if it's possible. Thanks. Dodo.Let's talk! 18:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done The AP (talk) 18:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Modify gadget

Use User:SaoMikoto/js/Gadget-RequestSolver.js to replace MediaWiki:Gadget-RequestSolver.js. Add a confirmation pop-up to prevent accidental clicks. —— From SAOUTAX the Dual Blades Bureaucrat 04:04, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done Peterxy12 (talk) 04:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)Reply