Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 11 December 2020 by Justarandomamerican in topic CheckUser testing
Content deleted Content added
→Justarandomamerican request for stewardship: moving to archive 5 |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:If a steward thinks you should have it, and assigns it to you, or you become a steward, then yes. Otherwise, no. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC) |
:If a steward thinks you should have it, and assigns it to you, or you become a steward, then yes. Otherwise, no. [[User:Justarandomamerican|Justarandomamerican]] ([[User talk:Justarandomamerican|talk]]) 23:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Fast|Justarandomamerican|BlackWidowMovie0}} Thanks. [[User:Seemplez|Seemplez]] ([[User talk:Seemplez|talk]]) 11:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Fast|Justarandomamerican|BlackWidowMovie0}} Thanks. [[User:Seemplez|Seemplez]] ([[User talk:Seemplez|talk]]) 11:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Fast for Steward == |
|||
{{discussion top|I'm honored by this nomination, and I'm always happy to help where I can. However, I don't have nearly the time available to meet the commitment expected of a new steward, especially as I've recently started assisting with janitorial tasks on a different wiki. As such I must politely decline this nomination, thank you. [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] ([[User talk:Fast|talk]]) 19:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)}} |
|||
Hi, I'd like to nominate {{ping|Fast}} for Steward. He is trustworthy, is constantly collaborating with users, and is active. He will lead this wiki with {{ping|Void|MacFan4000}} to make it greater than it already is. [[User:BlackWidowMovie0|BlackWidowMovie0]] ([[User talk:BlackWidowMovie0|talk]]) 18:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Acceptance:''' |
|||
*'''User:''' [[User:Fast|Fast - ZoomZoom]] |
|||
*'''Date:''' 18:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
=== Support === |
|||
'''STRONGEST SUPPORT:''' Per nomination. [[User:BlackWidowMovie0|BlackWidowMovie0]] ([[User talk:BlackWidowMovie0|talk]]) 18:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
=== Oppose === |
|||
=== Abstain/Neutral === |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
|||
== CheckUser testing == |
== CheckUser testing == |
||
Revision as of 23:56, 12 December 2020
| The community portal is Test Wiki's village pump and noticeboards, two-in-one. | |||
| Archives: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 | |||
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Oversight role?
@MacFan4000 and Void: Do you think it'd be possible to get an oversight role? Seemplez (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Seemplez: I'm just gonna bump in here, but there's no need for it right now. From what I've seen, everything is fine, and the CheckUser right isn't really needed either, the only use for the Steward permission is that it can revoke bureaucrat permissions from a user. BlackWidowMovie0 (talk) 17:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- I think we already have both kinds of oversight on this wiki, from google I saw https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/oversight which is revision deletion you should already be able to do the admin kind of revision deletion, there is also the suppress kind, which was done to a few entries a long time ago by MacFan4000, but for that you need to be in the suppress user group and only the stewards can assign that. Fast - ZoomZoom (talk) 18:14, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- If a steward thinks you should have it, and assigns it to you, or you become a steward, then yes. Otherwise, no. Justarandomamerican (talk) 23:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Fast, Justarandomamerican, and BlackWidowMovie0: Thanks. Seemplez (talk) 11:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
CheckUser testing
Currently, as shown in Special:ListGroupRights, it seems that only bureaucrats may use the checkuser-limited permission. This permission allows checking oneself for the purpose of testing out the tool. It may be a good idea to grant this permission to administrators as administrators is the primary for-testing group here and it should not be necessary to request bureaucratship for testing. In addition, when it is only possible to check oneself there is very little capacity for damage (checking others will still be limited to Stewards).
Opinions? Naleksuh (talk) 22:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Agree
checkuser-limitedis not really that sensitive, and certainly has less potential for damage than many of the other rights bundled with administrator. Fast - ZoomZoom (talk) 03:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC) - Agree. You can only test checkuser on yourself. Making a phabricator task..... Justarandomamerican (talk) 13:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)