Test Wiki:Community portal: Difference between revisions

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: 18 April 2022 by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh in topic Special:AbuseFilter/52
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
m I meant to type 52...
Line 22: Line 22:
These 2 users are blocked intefinite on Chinese Wikipedia and locked on Wikimedia foundation, [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=30118 this action] is suspected and 想舞花 had approved 七海娜娜米's [[Test Wiki:Request permissions/Archive10#七海娜娜米3b|request]] for adminship even though another bureaucrat had rejected it. Thanks! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 16:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
These 2 users are blocked intefinite on Chinese Wikipedia and locked on Wikimedia foundation, [https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=30118 this action] is suspected and 想舞花 had approved 七海娜娜米's [[Test Wiki:Request permissions/Archive10#七海娜娜米3b|request]] for adminship even though another bureaucrat had rejected it. Thanks! [[User:AlPaD|AlPaD]] ([[User talk:AlPaD|talk]]) 16:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


== [[Special:AbuseFilter/51]] ==
== [[Special:AbuseFilter/52]] ==


The third line should have been <code>& !page_id == 702</code>. Currently it's checking for spam edits on [[TW:RFP]]... [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh]] ([[User talk:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|talk]]) 10:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
The third line should have been <code>& !page_id == 702</code>. Currently it's checking for spam edits on [[TW:RFP]]... [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh]] ([[User talk:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|talk]]) 10:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:49, 18 April 2022

The community portal is Test Wiki's village pump and noticeboards, two-in-one.

Archives: 123456789101112


Mind if I suggest something?

Instead of having your access to the admin tools after 1 month goes by without activity, why not just have it be 3 months instead? I'd say that 1 month is a bit too short, and I'm not sure how one month would be enough of a reason. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 13:51, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Supports

 Support I like this idea, and can't see any drawbacks to it. Sei (My changes here | Drop me a line) 16:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
 Support I think it should be extended. LisafBia (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
 Support Per nom. I am one (as you are three) 23:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oppose

 Oppose We're giving out adminship and 'cratship as if they were candies. Isn't that good enough? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 10:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

CheckUser request

These 2 users are blocked intefinite on Chinese Wikipedia and locked on Wikimedia foundation, this action is suspected and 想舞花 had approved 七海娜娜米's request for adminship even though another bureaucrat had rejected it. Thanks! AlPaD (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Special:AbuseFilter/52

The third line should have been & !page_id == 702. Currently it's checking for spam edits on TW:RFP... NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 10:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pinging @Dmehus. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh (talk) 10:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply