User talk:Piccadilly
Welcome to the TestWiki!
We're glad to have you here! The Test Wiki is a giant wiki which anyone including you can contribute to and edit. With 67 articles, 4,369 users, 26 active users, 55,824 edits and 35 files, the TestWiki has been thriving!
Make sure to always assume Good Faith
Make sure to sign your posts with ~~~~
Have any questions? Ask on the Community Portal!
We hope you'll make great edits!
LOCO 🔥 00:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
My talk page archive: https://testwiki.wiki/wiki/User_talk:Seiyena/Archive
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thank for your reverts and deletions of blatant vandalism from 162.221.168.71, a cross-platform, cross-wiki long-term abuse case. Based on my initial Steward review of the situation, there was no further abuse, which is good, and you, DarkMatterMan4500, and LisafBia all handled the situation great. Dmehus (talk) 08:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC) |
Partial block
Hello, Seiyena.
You have been blocked as per request for 7 days from today. Enjoy your break. Trayfel • ( Edits | Talk ) 13:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I think it'll be good for me to take a step back and test things I can without any advanced permissions and maybe we can reassess things in a week (unless someone says otherwise). Seiyena (My Contribs | Talk to me) 15:26, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Notes for new section in Community Portal
The purpose of this proposal is for the bureaucrats and admins to agree on when I can request rights here, so there's no confusion. Also so we agree on what should be done if filter 88 is triggered again and it involves problematic language. I'm hoping that if the active admins and bureaucrats can come to an agreement here, we don't have to get the stewards involved unless absolutely necessary.
While this proposal is open (which will be around a week I'm thinking), I will not be requesting any rights, even minor ones
Proposal 1: 2 weeks before admin can be assigned, which any single crat can give. Bureaucrat may be granted a week after that assuming there have not been any problems.
Proposal 2:
Proposal 3: We use the proposal 3PPYB6 mentioned on the permissions request page:
": adminship and cratship will be re-granted via a bureaucrat-by-bureaucrat discussion in which we will determine your worthiness of the rights. If you trigger filter 88 deliberately (note that this is different from a false positive), your adminship and cratship will be revoked until bureaucrats can further decide on whether or not you still deserve the rights.
- If we can prove that time and time again you have triggered filter 88 with intention and in bad faith, you will be sent to the community portal where you will face the stewards. They will figure out what to do next."
Anyone is free to add their own proposals as well.